3D v. Poser
There have been some scuffles between artists regarding the usage of the software tool called "Poser". Most of the complaints come from 3D Modelers who take exception to 3D Manipulators who admit to using Poser to the point where I've seen someone commend an artist and ask what software they used, only to then hiss and scream when the artist mentioned the use of Poser. It's like what holy water is to vampires (or so we've been led to believe). Here are some comments I've seen before, addressed from a bird's eye perspective.
~ Haven't we seen this pattern before?
The photographer civil war over stock photos equating to "selling out the artistic photographer's soul" is over - with all photographers realizing that bread still costs the same and all coins taste the same and that you can work for the Man by day and create Art at night. The Digital versus Analog "media processing and publishing" revolutiion is over (unfortunately Our Fair Lady Copyright is being stabbed with right-clicks every day). On other horizons, we still have fights over Traditional painters and Digital painters, but a cease fire is in negotiation. And now the white-towers of the 3D palace are being inhabited by mere commoners?
Photoshop has had a similar past of hatred from film developers and traditional painters. Now Photoshop is a verb much like Google, and we have digital still- and motion cameras and only luddites give a care when you mention the use of Photoshop as one of your tools.
This xenophobia can be countered if you throw in a few traditional terms, such as f-stops or depth-of-field to help calm fears. Change is not comfortable. Poser, as any other tool, can be used with default settings for canned results, or in imaginative ways that are still being discovered.
~ "Why does Poser get more love than my tools?"
Poser would not have the popularity it has today without the easy-to-use interface, compliments of Kai Krause, and probably more importantly the support of an inexpensive third party content community. A few groups saw the stock photo boom of cheap and readily accessible photographs being far more popular than the slow process of acquiring stock photos from archive brokers that priced images literally on a case by case basis. Stock 3D models and textures and lights, had been around for some time, but now there is a market providing cheap add-ons for a program that doesn't require you to spend time doing any modeling yourself. Thus the perception of a "paper doll" or "push-one-button-to-render" tool as some have whispered.
~ "Poser requires little or no skill."
But look at what Poser DOES require: You have to Pose the scene and all the props and figures, modify textures, rig the lighting, animate dynamic cloth, and render the image.
All creative Poser users also have additional tools to enhance their work - Photoshop, 3D modeling programs for those objects that cannot be purchased, other 3D programs that do better lighting and rendering, etc. To call an artist that uses Poser, unskilled, is to not appreciate all of the things that they might do, compared someone that just does 3D modeling. You may be able to make an awesome car in 3D, but know little or nothing about texturing or lighting. Does that make you meaningless - of course not.
~ "All Poser art looks the same."
Yes there are simplistic artworks created using Poser and some Poser renders look like others because the artist is not fully customizing their work, but they're learning. I recall numerous crayon drawings in school from various artists that all looked the same for years. Putting your own artistic flair to a project requires creativity, regardless of the tool. If you only have a hammer, every project you do will end up looking the same until you start using different nails and change your approach to the tool. Eventually you may acquire more tools in order to do different projects. Ask around to see how many people out there were at first intimidated by big 3D applications, got their feet wet with Poser and now have gone on to learn different 3D programs.
~ "Poser users aren't learning 'Real' 3D"
We don't frown upon painters that buy tubes of Cobalt Blue, instead of mixing their own pigments. We don't frown at painters that buy a sable-haired brush instead of making their own. We don't frown upon photographers who don't build their own cameras or make all of their own film or props. In fact we don't frown upon 3D modelers who use commercial packages to do their own modeling instead of learning how to program and create software themselves.
No, Poser is not a 3D modeling program. Never was and probably never will be. But it does allow an artist to execute their vision in a short amount of time. Creating a single 3D prop could take hours in some programs. With Poser you can develop an entire scene full of figures and props and lighting in half that time. Granted, a quick Poser composition and render may not include the shadowing and lighting and texturing finesse of a beefier 3D program like Maya or 3D Studio Max, but Poser the tool gets better and more powerful with each revision.
~ "Poser is just a toy"
Unless there are elemental forces that require patience, work-flow efficiencies will ALWAYS be taken advantage of, by amateurs and professionals. Combine that with a large and inexpensive third party content community - and you have the recipe for a lot of Poser use from amateur hobbyists to professionals that want mock-ups or quick animatics.
~ "Poser users lack creativity."
Art is not about the tool, nor the artist - all egos aside. The means (legal and ethical), justify the ends. Does the final piece of artwork deliver a message or make the viewer think. Nobody looks down on the Simpson's or South Park or Family Guy as poorly animated cartoons - they are viewed for what they communicate. The more Poser use there is, the faster the day will come when someone shows you something that makes you cry or say 'wow', and it was made using Poser (by itself or combined with other tools). That day will come much sooner than you expect.
Epilogue, and Coming out of the Closet
For the record, I use Poser (listens for the end of the world... no planes crashing or sun exploding...). But I have also used many other software packages through the years - and continue to do so. Why do I keep using Poser when I've tasted finer softwares? Well, it has drastically improved from the early ball and joint doll software that it was initially intended to be. And frankly, the cheap and vast third party support makes it easy to fill out a scene regardless of the time period you are trying to depict.
I do make props in 3D for things that I cannot find. I do make my own custom textures and lighting setups. I have never been satisfied with a Poser render by itself and have always done postwork using Photoshop. But let my gallery speak for itself - I try to make each image tell a story or at least create enough character that you think there may be more information there worth investigating. If you don't like me or my art because I use Poser, that is your problem to think about. Can't we all just get along?
News & Links
I find I'm repeatedly giving out these
computer-related links to people:
ATI Video Card Chart:
[link]NVidia Video Card Chart:
[link]THE LCD Thread (education and recommendations):
[link]Calibration your Monitor by hand:
[link]Buy Computer bits cheap:
[link]ConsumerReports doesn't do computer parts (product cycle too fast), so here are two good reviews and forums:
[link] and
[link]The following deviants

gifted me a DA subscription. THANKS!
Favorite Deviations Featured
08.MAY Featured Deviation (Photography)

2004-20 by *JimDuvallVisual gimmicks, like most candy, are always fun to consume, but seldom sustain. Seeing this image again and again, I am still impressed. The obvious comments regarding a first impression of the piercing, I'll leave to each viewer.
One can glance at this image and claim sexism or misogyny. But the photographer, by accident or design, transcends the casual observer's opinion with the position of the model's heads and hands.
Looking closely, we can see that the woman is peering up at the male with a warm expression, and perhaps a smile, though we cannot see her entire face. Her arms are not tense and her entire body looks at ease and somewhat relaxed, giving an impression that she is not being tortured, but has given herself with full consent. The male is also nude, sharing in the unclothed vulnerability and intimacy. He plucks the strings gently, to draw forth music without injuring his partner. His head is bent in concentration, or he is returning her gaze. The power exchange is complete and appears fulfilling to both participants. This may explain why the non-piercing comments are of viewer's identifying with a depiction of love and devotion.
08.APR Featured Deviation (Abstract)

Annihilation Myth 1 by `SenecalWhat is the worth of abstract art: To force the viewer to contemplate a specific theme or demonstrate an artistic technique, or all this and more? View this image at full size to appreciate it. The artist's works are all great, but this one communicates on a subconscious level.
"Annihilation" is a complete destruction and adding "Myth" to the title makes you wonder if the annihilation happened so long ago as to nearly be forgotten, or is this a metaphorical message to raise our individual awareness.
The lack of color emphasizes the stark contrast and "illumination" of the white space, or "light". Sandy-colored areas subtly communicate a reminder of the flesh in combination with the nudity - an abandonment of materialism. The onion skin layers give a hint at something underneath or express a notion of multi-dimensional existence if we can only attune ourselves to experience it.
Identical body images repeat like a visual mantra, creating a continual heartbeat in the image between something seen and unseen. Chaotic scribbles and blotches add to the energy and the obscured faces hint that the annihilation is not a destruction, but a possible a shift in consciousness. With no identity, it is easier for the viewer to project themselves into the body depicted, regardless of gender (Or perhaps the whole message is about gender?). Finally, the obscured and enigmatic pyramid in the background draws us, as if it is a machine to aid us in our transfiguration.
08.MAR Featured Deviation (3D)

Fume by *alexalvarezMost Daily Deviations are deserved, and this image most definitely! The modeling work is excellent. Set aside that technical and creative feat - this picture says more than a thousand words.
The harsh lighting, and solitaire figure suggests that this is possibly an interrogation. The humanoid alien certainly doesn't look excited, and the quantity of smoke indicates that the room must be small, or there are other figures off-screen that are also smoking.
But the smallest of details are what makes this image emote with force. The burning cigarette is limp. The alien's teeth are stained and not perfect. The angled body and tilted head make this feel less posed and more of a captured moment, especially with the curling smoke, which we are used to seeing in motion. And the expression (albeit a projection of human expectation) is slightly relaxed, perhaps annoyed, and even a little arrogant, or just bored.
This viewer is intrigued, wanting to learn more of the backstory. I am reminded of a rule in good writing: show, don't tell.
08.FEB Featured Deviation(Digital)

. blitzkrieg . by `karincomaThis image has a great sense of motion, with the wind blown hair and little red petals/leaves/blood splatter. The shadow on the ground indicates a bright, low altitude light source which creates an aggressive and mysterious tone. The subtle perspective on the figure creates depth to the scene, enhanced by the shadow. Overall, the composition is brilliant in its simplicity. The fingers on the outstretched hand add an extra level of curiosity as the figure isn't really pointing or gesturing with any clear communication - as if the image is captured in the middle of the action.
I don't know if it was a mistake or intention, but the black bar on the left, as simple as it might appear, completely balances the image. The hair is blowing off-screen to the right, which would normally take the viewer's eye out of the frame and insult the composition. But the black bar placed on the opposite side and bleeding off-screen to the left, balances the composition and creates more questions than answers. The bright light source is coming from behind or around the corner of this black bar - s it a door, or a wall? We're not sure, and in the end it doesn't matter because it has done what it needed to do, balance the image and strike a contrast against the light source.
08.JAN Featured Deviation (Photo)
Ann by ~JoSchwabI find this photograph fascinating. The pose is very stiff and formal and the setting bare and the lighting flat, all of which establishes a sterile and documentary feeling. The coifed hair and elegant pearl choker add to the model's grace and create a conservative contrast against the alternative nipple piercings. The choker, viewed from a deviant perspective, can be seen as an expensive metaphor or literal collar which implies a possible power exchange not evident with just a glance. The diagonal nipple piercings are a departure from the traditional horizontal alignment, which further enhances the mystery and unexpected contrasts throughout the image. Now maybe you'll think twice about the Contessa when you see her at the Winter Ball.
<Naked Blades]=0
Naked Blades is a free sword-and-sorcery themed erotic story archive featuring works from professionals and amateurs. The following Deviants have granted permission for use of their works:
Art v. Greed
(or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb)

Boycott SuicideGirls: Although this is not new, it is ongoing... the owner of SuicideGirls has devolved into a blubbering greedy empirical primate with a lot of cash and a skewed perspective on reality and art. Apparently their tribe did not get exposed to the rectangular black obelisk millions of years ago - or maybe they did, but got stuck on a branch of evolution that broke off the tree. Read the story through the links below. The best definition of sin I've ever heard: "Sin is the denial of the right to thrive" which changed my perspective on life and how I treat others. In any case... if you can't donate cash, you can still vote with your wallet by NOT supporting SuicideGirls, and spreading the word for everyone else (models, photographers, customers) to avoid them. Read more at Stacey73's journal entry
[link] and Apnea's letter
[link] and support Philip on DA `
lithiumpicnic and another story on the ongoing boycott:
[link]Bucketheads: Visit the link below and read as much as you want, but definitely sign the petition which is a soft hammer to swing at Photo Bucket until someone actually sues the website for copyright infringement.
[link] DeviantArt Clubs of Interest
Quotations & Introspection
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
- MLK Jr."If I were not an atheist, I would believe in a God who would choose to save people on the basis of the totality of their lives and not the pattern of their words. I think he would prefer an honest and righteous atheist to a TV preacher whose every word is God, God, God, and whose every deed is foul, foul, foul."
- Isaac Asimov"To rationalize their lies, people -- and the governments, churches, or terrorist cells they compose -- are apt to regard their private interests and desires as just."
- Wendy Kaminer"Saints need sinners."
- Alan Watts"Try not to become a man of success but rather try to become a man of value."
- Albert Einstein"When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
- Arthur C. Clarke (Clarke's First Law)"Imagination is more important than knowledge..."
- Albert Einstein"One watches them on the seashore, all the people, and there is something pathetic, almost wistful in them, as if they wished their lives did not add up to this scaly nullity of possession, but as if they could not escape. It is a dragon that has devoured us all: these obscene, scaly houses, this insatiable struggle and desire to possess, to possess always and in spite of everything, this need to be an owner, lest one be owned. It is too hideous and nauseating. Owners and owned, they are like the two sides of a ghastly disease. One feels a sort of madness come over one, as if the world had become hell. But it is only superimposed: it is only a temporary disease. It can be cleaned away."
- D.H. Lawrence"To bend like a reed in the wind - that is real strength."
- Tao Te Ching verse 52 excerpt, translated interpretationDifferent translations:
[link] [link] [link]"My dog is worried about the economy because Alpo is up to $0.99 a can. That's almost $7.00 in dog money."
- Joe WeinsteinMy Compooter
Given that we're all wired geeks, I'm surprised DA doesn't have a computer spec display in the Profile. I'm not an spec fanatic, but I did build this on my own which is why I have all the numbers. This rig will not impress a cutting-edge freak but it works for me:
Case Enermax 305 Black
Power Supply Corsair TX 750W
Motherboard Asus P4C800-E Deluxe (i875p)
Processor Intel P4 3.4GHz SL7CH Extreme Edition
CPU Cooling Zalman 9500c
Memory Corsair 2x1GB PC3200 DDR
Memory Corsair 2x512MB PC3200 DDR
Video Card Sapphire ATI Radeon x1950 Pro 512MB 256-bit DDR3
Audio Card HT Omega Claro +plus
Hard Drive Western Digital Caviar SE8 160GB AAJB SATA
Hard Drive Western Digital Caviar SE16 500GB AAKS SATA
Hard Drive Western Digital Caviar 1200JB IDE
Hard Drive Western Digital Caviar 400JB IDE
Optical Drive Pioneer DVD-RW 112D
Optical Drive Samsung CDR-RW SW252B
Display Samsung SyncMaster 226CW 22" LCD (not recommended)
Display Dell 1704FPT 17" LCD monitor (great)
Input BENQ slim keyboard + Logitech Laser mouse
Input Wacom Intuos Tablet
Audio Speakers pair of Swans D1080 MKII
Operating System Windows XP Pro +SP2
Web Browser FireFox 2.x
3D Programs Poser 7, Rhinoceros 3, Cinema4D R10
Graphic Programs Photoshop CS2
Orodreth FanArt & Commissions